Sunday, October 23, 2016

Why Links Are So Important to the Internet

I Did Not Invent the Internet, However the Man Who Did Links to My Blog

I will show you an example of "good merit based" link building that Google likes.
About the best backlink you could obtain in the software, Internet and SEO industry would be a link from a prestigious university, from a top expert and a famous award winning distinguished person.

Please click here, then click in the #1 video listed on the webpage and see where it links you to.

The following is an excellent article and basic overview of links and why they are so important to the web.
"As an emerging industry, SEO is a field ripe for new college graduates ... The first thing a new SEO must learn is how Google operates. This means learning the value of links in search..."

One small correction I would make to Cory's article is that powerful backlinks are still by far the most important factor in the Google algorithms and they will continue to be because there is science behind this.

The reason search engines will most likely never change this is that this methodology works great, and no other technique works better. Why Do you think Google named it PageRank?
The Wikipedia article for PageRank is wrong and defective just like many of the Wikipedia articles. Because the Wikipedia editors are incompetent and do not know what they are doing.
Click here if you would like to learn from a real expert, me.

 Link Building

The people that tell you links are not important any longer are complete Dumb-asses and you should never listen to them.
I am not sure how I can make this point any clearer.

For more advanced information and training about link building or for help, please email me.
I suggest you also read:

Saturday, October 22, 2016

How to Speak to People so They Respect and Listen to You

There is a reason 8,000,000 people have watched this video. I think every person including myself should watch classic business and life improvement videos like this. In my opinion this gentleman named Andreas Ekstrom is an example of an outstanding public speaker.

List of Directory Submission Sites That Google Likes

By Tom Forrest
List of Directory Submission Sites.
List of directories that Google likes and that follow Google Guidelines.

Google has cracked down on web directories that violate Google guidelines.  You should not place your website on any free and low quality directories or websites, you need fewer directory listings with better quality in order to be successful with Google, Yahoo and Bing. Please read the following new article about effective SEO Link Building to learn more.

So I decided I should give people a list of Internet directories that Google thinks are valid and that if you obtained a listing from these directories it would help you with direct traffic generation and also as a "good" backlink as far as Google is concerned. The Directories below are valuable worldwide and all countries should consider submitting their website to these top quality Directories.


Comments from Matt Cutts of Google on what to consider when submitting to a Directory.
When considering submitting to a directory, I’d ask questions like:
- Does the directory reject urls?
If every url passes a review, the directory gets closer to just a list of links or a free-for-all link site.
- What is the quality of urls in the directory?
Suppose a site rejects 25% of submissions, but the urls that are accepted/listed are still quite low-quality or spammy. That doesn’t speak well to the quality of the directory.
- If there is a fee, what’s the purpose of the fee?
For a high-quality directory, the fee is primarily for the time/effort for someone to do a genuine evaluation of a url.
Matt Cutts, Google

Friday, October 21, 2016

Google's Cultural Institute is a Fantastic and Magical Project, I Love It

I do not know much about art and I have no natural artistic skills, however I love going to every art museum I can around the world.
So how can people that cannot afford to travel to different art museums see all this fantastic art?

The answer is the Google Cultural Institute.
Please visit this site and also watch this interesting TED video below.

Google is Defending a Law Suit in Florida, E-Ventures vs. Google - Will Google Unfairly Censor This Article? Please Search for this Content on Google. Are Google Guidelines Deceptive?

The summary below is from a law suit Google is defending currently for manually removing websites so no one could see them via a Google search. Why did Google put this companies 232 websites back into Google only after they sued Google? If it really was spam as Google claims why did Google not leave the penalty on them?
I smell "Big Brother Google's" evil bullshit.  Please click below to read the Forbes article.
I found out from some of my attorney friends that Florida is one of the best places to file a case like this against Google. I am trying to figure out when the next court hearing is so I can follow this legal case on my blog. This is why the most talented SEO experts in the world have to keep all their websites secret from Google and not use the Google Search Console, because you cannot trust Google to treat you fairly and Google has demonstrated a long history of abusing SEO experts.

"GotoTom2 Search Console for Google to read."
The worst part of this for Google is that I have plenty of solid proof and evidence regarding moving content that Google manually unfairly penalized to other peoples websites. Once the previously inappropriately censored content is moved Google does not penalize it. Guess what Google you are caught red-handed.
Why would you not track this "spam" to other peoples websites and penalize it?
I can easily find it in under one second using a Google search.
Why would you ignore the terrible content being moved and instead focus on penalizing more content and websites of the "unfairly targeted owner"? Is it because your real intention is not to penalize "spam" and that the content was really not spam in the first place?
Why should the Google spam police even know who the owner of a website is if their job is to evaluate content fairly for all people?

At the minimum this looks very bad, and if it is not illegal we should pass new laws and regulations to make it illegal. What might be the next group Google may decide to target and inappropriately censor and punish?

I will also show you a website that Google has incorrectly penalized and I had to tell a young women writer, I am sorry Google unfairly censored your content so your Mother cannot search for it on Google. This is an example of pure evil in my opinion. The young lady writer cried about this situation. Google wants to inappropriately punish me, however they are just harming innocent people that write for me and some of them are single mothers trying to earn a living as a writer. is unfairly censored by Google for 6-months already, yet Google is okay with this web page and site:

It seems to me that the Google SPAM Police have the Wrong Priorities

Also if you look at thousands of websites like I do, you learn what Google might and perhaps should penalize. For example this site has poor quality content and you can see the only purpose is to do link building for a "go-cart track" in Chicago. Yet Google does not penalize this blog and there are more "spammy" webpages than this that Google does not penalize.
So it is clear to me when Google is abusing me and denying me my freedom of speech. I sincerely believe I could do a better job of cleaning up the Internet than Google can given the same financial resources.

Because of these facts, Google executive management should immediately forbid the Google Spam department from having any knowledge about website ownership. They do not need this information and clearly they have shown a pattern of abuse.
This would help with the above mentioned problems, Google will still make mistakes and penalize innocent people unfairly however then we could at least be assured Google is not inappropriately targeting, bullying, and incorrectly discriminating against a specific and targeted group of "operators of interest". 

An Interesting Article About Google Censorship I Found in My Research, I am Doing More Research on this Topic in the Future

by Tom Forrest

I am conducting research in order to write more articles about Internet censorship. I found this interesting article below about Google.
I do know from my own personal experience of Google inappropriately censoring me, that all people worldwide should be very concerned about Google unfairly censoring, punishing (bully) and penalizing the general public, and business owners websites. 
Google executive management has helped me in the past and I sincerely appreciate it. Frankly I do not believe the founders of Google support unfair censorship so hopefully any bad Google employees will be terminated. Perhaps because Google is so big it is difficult to control mistakes regarding censorship. For example I have an ongoing problem of Google inappropriately censoring and .org, because Google does not like an article I wrote. Also the listing in the Google Chrome store for my online password manager is missing in the search results sometimes.
I try to be nice and when Google manually takes the unfair censorship off of me, I edit my articles to be less negative about Google. To me that is the polite thing to do, however the next day the Google automated system over writes the manual fix, and since Google has no customer service department, how can I complain?
My only recourse is to write a truthful yet negative article about Google. It seems very silly to me that Google does not have any customer service department at all. I think it leads to much of the criticism of Google and if they fixed this their public relations would be improved. If Google had a way to learn about their embarrassing mistakes, then they could fix them. The current system from the Google webmaster tools control panel, or whatever they call it today is of no use in these unfair censorship problems and perhaps Google needs better ways to audit bad employees, e.g. a manager in a different group must approve a serious censorship penalty. Since Google is so secretive we have no idea about what processes Google uses to decide which websites to censor and this leads to unfair terrible punishment of innocent websites and people. How does Google make sure they are implementing their censorship penalties fairly? Who audits and regulates Google to prevent abuse of webmasters and small business owners?

Is Google the Worlds Biggest Censor?
Does Google Need Government Regulation in Order to Protect Small Business Owners?

If Google were just another mom-and-pop shop with a sign saying "we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone," that would be one thing. But as the golden gateway to all knowledge, Google has rapidly become an essential in people's lives – nearly as essential as air or water. We don't let public utilities make arbitrary and secretive decisions about denying people services; we shouldn't let Google do so either.

Google does not want communist China censoring them, however it seems to me that sometimes Google is okay with their censoring of people and acting in a similar manner to (like) communist China. Google has brought the government to their doorstep by doing a defective job of protecting people's "freedom of speech" and treating all people equally and fairly regarding Google penalties. A Google penalty is an example of how Google implements censorship. E.g. Denying your content access to the "golden gateway of knowledge", which Google controls.

Please help protect "freedom of speech" and share this blog post and article with your friends and business associates.

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Are There Ethical Issues with the Media and Hillary Clinton? Wikileaks Assange Cut Off From the Internet by Ecuador, Wikileaks will not Reveal Source of Clinton Emails

This story becomes even more interesting. Please see the latest video news below.

How Safe Are Password Managers?

This video is very funny and makes an important point.

Based on all the past problems Sony has faced with hackers and the fact that Sony did not do a good job of protecting passwords.  Furthermore with the general public concerned about the US government spying on citizens I thought it would be important to explain why everyone should be using an Online Password Manager for business, personal, SEO and marketing. No one has your passwords except you. We can not see or retrieve them because they are stored in a secure military 256k encrypted vault in the cloud.